Categories
Background

What does a good Court Self-Help website look like?

Last summer, I started a design review of the California Judicial Council’s Self-Help webpage. It is meant to be a central hub for lay people in the state to find legal resources & referrals for their life problems. The goal is that the state court can provide a trustworthy & centralized hand-off to either local, court-sponsored Self-Help centers (where pro per litigants — without a lawyer — can get court lawyers’ help in figuring out the right forms to fill out, and how to fill them out) or to other legal bodies.

So what should this website look like? I’ve been sketching out some designs.

Self Help online presence design - Margaret Hagan

Here are some of the functions that the site should have:

For the Main Content

  • A bolder, graphic welcome & orientation message
  • Prominent, image based links to the most commonly clicked help pages
  • A 1-2-3 storyboard of how a lay person can use this site, what functions it will provide to them (and what the dominant flow through the site will be)
  • The full collection of resources organized into chunks, framed around lay people-terms of the ‘legal problem’, and each marked with their own icon (and a search/filter function at the top of this section of resources)

For the Sidebar

  • Very prominent search bar — with big text and set off with other bg color — and perhaps 300 px tall
  • En Espanol in larger text
  • Reframing the Librarian-chat in a more conversational way, with a sample question in gray
  • Reframing the map in a conversational way — around the question of “Where to find help”

Apart from these specific functions, I’ve also drawn up some more general User Experience/User Interface guidelines for those designing online legal portals, like this self-help site.

CHECKLIST 1: SIMPLICITY & GUIDANCE

Orient your user immediately as to what path they may want to take. Present a roadmap that orients them, that lets them see what you have on offer & where they may want to go. Anticipate what they will likely need & tell them the pathways to get the information & tools to get them there

Give relevant Entry Points to your site’s resources. Present scenarios or personas as entry points. First present the most basic possible pathways (likely, categorize the type of legal situation you’re dealing with, choose a ‘type of law’ path).

Build a Clear Hierarchy: Present information in a clear, thoughtful hierarchy. Only disclose what is necessary at that moment. When you do present it, make sure it is presented with clear logic & rationale.

Do not present long lists of resources. Present resources in categories based on answers to specific questions (how to solve this need? how to accomplish this task?). Do not present alphabetic lists. Categorize and group them. Present indexes based on how your user understands her problem, names her problem, categorizes her problem. That is not usually be the first letter of a term for the problem — a term she may not even know.

Stage information. Present very limited information in the first place, with a limited set of options that the user can pursue — and gradually uncover more specific, in-depth information she is seeking out. Have a comprehensive set of information on your site, but do not present it at first. Let the user unpack it if she wants it. Otherwise, give summaries, shortcuts, headlines, and other ways to digest main points without having to spend time reading through comprehensive explanations, lists, options, etc.

Be consistent, be familiar. At each step, have a consistent template of information you’re providing to them. Borrow these patterns from other dominant services and products in your area. Put your user at ease so they know what to expect, where to find things, how easily to scan & shortcut through your material.

Create a Dominant Flow-Pathway. Have a path of least resistance, especially for the new user and the naive user. They want to just flow through process in the quickest, least thoughtful way possible (the ‘No-Brainer’ mode). Make it easy to stay on path — don’t give lots of other options or pathways when they’re on a path. If most of your users are naive to the experience or content, then rein them in. Give them more of a single-use path, that lets them accomplish a task with very clear & strict direction from you.

Give Shortcuts: Especially for expert users, allow them to jump off your dominant flow-pathway. Give lots of shortcuts to find the right bit of information for the user who is coming to the site ‘with a bullet’. Right from the first page, let the user go to the Specific Tasks that she wants to accomplish, through a search box, an index, or a common-shortcut list. Don’t lock your user into the dominant-path. Do not make them feel trapped. Let the user ‘Off-Road’, wandering farther afield, to dive in more, to try things out, especially if they are in expert mode and want something very specific. Give these off-roaders the ability to undo, reverse, and go back to the home-path.

Use white space, do not crowd: space out all of the resources you are providing. Add icons and pictures to flag different categories, tasks, path-entry points. Do not crowd pages with lots of text and options.

CHECKLIST 2: USER-FRIENDLY CONTENT

  • Architect your resources into an integrated system. Take a step back to look at all the resources you want to offer to your users, and organize them into a coherent flow of content. Sort & categorize it, cut repetition, and find where you are missing resources that you need to collect.
  • Unbury your materials out of PDF and Word documents. When you are presenting legal documents, forms, resources, or otherwise to your user, present them whenever possible on your website, in html, and not as an attachment in another file format (most common culprits: the links to the .pdf download or the .doc download). Take it out of these other formats and lay it out into the flow of your site. If the material is meant to be filled in by the user ( like a form) or printed off (like a training manual) then give them the option to download the .pdf or .doc — but always present it live on your site first, and give the user a clear way to download it in the non-html format.
  • Only use the plainest of plain language. Rewrite your existing resources into terms that are meant for the layest of lay users, even when your target audience is very well-educated & familiar with law. Take out all jargon, or define it immediately & in simple terms if you must use jargon terms.
  • Make your knowledge visual, graphic, and easy to look at. When you can, transform your text into (or add to your text with) icons, photographs, diagrams, cartoons, and scenarios. Even putting a face on each page will help your user pay attention & relate to the content better. Particularly when you want a user to pay attention to a piece of content, put an image with it.
  • Convert long paragraphs into digestible formats. Big chunks of text will induce gloss-over & misunderstanding. Break them apart intelligently & strategically. Use as many checklists and bullet-points as possible, so that the user can designate individual steps and concerns easily.
  • Keep your content Up-To-Date & Correct. Do not let your information go to seed. Keep pruning. Remove resources that are out of date. Check back with contributors. Recruit new donations. Recruit updates. Users will tune out from your resource as a whole if even part of your resources contain faulty or irrelevant information.
  • Ensure your site is mobile-friendly. What does your site look like on a mobile phone? Make sure your site is responsive to the screen size, so the text & containers all change size for optimal phone experience!

CHECKLIST 3: INTERACTIVITY & RESPONSIVENESS

  • Allow for multiple modes of interaction. Give users multiple ways to get their intended task done, based on their user preferences. Like, some may want to browse to find the right thing and check it out; others may want to search through query to get right to an answer for their query.
  • Give rewards, sense of achievement. Let the user check things off, feel they have progressed, be rewarded by the interface for having got through material. Provide immediate reactions when a user has taken a step, so they know it has registered & they feel satisfied that it is done.
  • Make the possible interactions direct, clear & limited. Make it very clear to the user at each page/section/step what they should be doing— and what the effect of their actions will be. Give clear tips for each possible action the user might take. Give one screen per goal. Don’t crowd with too many functions or tasks, make it clear what the goal is.
  • Reduce the number of clicks. Let the user stay on the same page for as long as possible, but stage & selectively reveal/hide the information on the same page. Put in enough details for a person to know what they’re clicking on (don’t make them click for them to find out what will be at the link). You can use hover to give the details without a click. Also try to avoid too much scrolling, closing, clicking…
  • Once a user has made some choices, give Targeted & Bordered Resources. Once a person has chosen a certain pathway, then you know which specific area of your site that she wants to be in. Wall off the other resources on the sites from her, so that she doesn’t accidentally cross over into another area that doesn’t apply to her. She can come back to the home & restart her search if she wants to enter another area of resources.
  • Give Status Mechanisms to keep users aware. Tell your user if there’s been a failure, if conditions are changing, what the status of a process is, when things are being saved, what can be done/undone.
Categories
Current Projects Dispute Resolution

Can we crowdsource justice through tv? Primetime courts & audience juries

You The Jury - tv civil courts

News appeared today that NBC picked up a pilot from the man behind Law & Order, Dick Wolf, to create a show for next TV season, called You The Jury.

On the show, a civil court case will play out, and the TV-watching public will play the jury. Like with American Idol or other reality shows, people watching at home can use their digital devices to vote on the outcome they think best.

Producers from other reality competitions — Master Chef & Project Runway — will also be working on this show as well.

What does this mean, is it good or bad? One part of me is excited for more view into the realities of the legal process on primetime television — perhaps this is a democratizing effort to make the legal system more comprehensible and visible to normal people. And like other online proposals to crowdsource dispute resolution, through lots of people voicing ‘what’s right, what’s wrong’ — then there might be some model that could be useful in new dispute resolution design.

But my big fears are (1) that a narrative/reality-based show approach will oversimplify the case and lead to distorted outcomes, and (2) that like with Serial, when you open a real-life case open for public scrutiny through mass media, the public might end up pursuing mob justice on platforms like Reddit and otherwise.

Any thoughts, should we be hybridizing our justice system with entertainment channels? Is there any upside to this that makes it worth the potential risks?

Categories
Ideabook Integration into Community

Online Legal Portals to centralize triage, intake, and services

Ideabook -Mega Portal To Legal Help

What would it look like if there was one major site online, that anyone searching out help for a life problem could use?

They would enter their problem, legal issues would be identified, and then the person would be directed to the legal org who can help them.

They will get a warm hand-off and introduction to that org, and maybe even schedule an appointment right there on the website.

All of this is opposed to the current status quo — searching for help, not being able to find local or available service providers on one site, and not figuring out how to actually make an appointment happen (if you are even eligible for an appointment).

This idea grew out of May 2015’s  ABA Summit on Legal Innovation. Watching all the presentations, and participating in Blue Sky innovations — my main priorities and agenda items for innovating services all got boiled down to one blaring message:

Design the Internet to be a legal help service

Here are some of the people that called for centralizing, coordinating legal help from the users’ point of view:

wpid-20150503_102729-1.jpg wpid-20150503_103102-1.jpg wpid-20150504_090951-1.jpg

There are a few initiatives that must happen to get the Internet to be a law-friendly, people-friendly resource for anyone who is going to type in a query seeking out help for their divorce, debt, bankruptcy, child custody, landlord-tenant issue (and beyond…). Here’s what I’m seeing as a shortlist of things to be working on:

  1. Deep, design-driven research into how lay people approach the Internet when seeking out help for their life (legal) problems (Note: I’ve been doing this, now I need to scale it up & publish the resources)Legal Innovation - user research
  2. Using understandings from this research to feed into new concept designs, principles/heuristics/guides for what better interventions could be, to get the Online Help Seeker to Quality Legal Services easily, directly, happily
  3. Partnering with the right organizations to get these interventions implemented:
    1. Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and other search engine companies — which are really the crucial portal for how a lay person will seek out and find legal help
    2. States’ Legal Help sites
    3. Courts’ Self-Help/Public-Facing sites
    4. Other social service/governmental groups that have adjacent, linked resources to legal services’ resources
    5. Legal Aid groups
    6. Consumer Law websites

For step 2 — what the right interventions are to get the Internet to serve legal help-seekers in a better way, I have my inclination about what some key things will be.

    1. Centralized Legal Help Portals: each state, or maybe even the whole country has one *strongly branded* website that does an issue-based, person-based, and jursidiction-based triage on the visitor, and funnels them to a legal help channel that works for them. Its one central, recognizable place that can warmly hand the person off to the right local resource — tells them what their legal issue is called — and whether they might qualify for legal help.Legal Innovation ideas - 211 portals for legal help

The LSC-TIG Summit last year listed centralized state-by-state legal portals as one of their central agenda items, and I want to see this happen!

  1. Smarter, More Directed Search Results: if people are always going to be typing in a query into a search engine (Google, Bing, Yahoo…) then why not intervene right there, at the search result list? Like I’ve written before, I want better legal help directions right there on the search results page.
  2. Coordinated Data & Service Offerings among legal aid groups, courts, pro bono, consumer sites, and any other service-provider — so that a person can see the relevant and applicable offerings for them. A site would be able to triage a general Internet-help-seeker to the right service provider and hand them off. To do this, we need to get the service providers all saving, structuring, and sharing their service-offering-info in a coordinated & open way — so that we can collect it and implement triage and hand-off tools on top of it. Look at what Open Referral (associated with Code For America) is doing along this line for general social service providers. Tools like Purple Binder and mRelief can be built on top of this coordinated system.

Okay, whew! That’s a lot of ideas and lists.

Now, to add on a few sketches of what I’m thinking about for these centralized legal portals, centralized triage, etc… They are all at the raw stage, but hopefully they offer some grounding to the ideas I’ve fired out above.

Looking back through my iPad sketchbooks, I came across this sketch of what an online legal help portal might look like. It’s a topic I’ve been thinking about a lot — what the right kind of entry point might be for a lay person trying to figure out what their legal issue is and how to deal with with.

The main points I was trying to make with this sketch were:

  1. Putting a very human-friendly search as the priority entry point: just let the user type in what their issue is, and then have the site be smart enough to direct them to what the legal categorization of their problem is
  2. Having back-up common choices: for those who don’t want to search, or who are in a browsing mood, they can see some common legal categorizations to browse through and see if any of them sounds like a good fit for what’s going on in their life
  3. Official marker: to show trustworthiness and encourage engagement, put the official connection front and center on the page, as a badge that declares “you, casual Internet browser, can trust this site! We are not trying to sell you anything, and we are official experts on the law”. This is what Internet-browsers want to see when they’re sizing up legal info sites.
  4. Upon search, visual card glimpses into resources: rather than show a straight text list, show search query results in distinct cards, that have a straightforward visual, a headline, and a glimpse into the content that awaits upon a click. For a person who doesn’t know exactly what legal terrain they’re in, the cards give them some quick glances at what might apply to them. The visitor can look through them before deciding which to click open & pursue.

Here are some more digital sketches that had come out of earlier design sprints on making courts more accessible.

 

Access Hub site.001

Centralized legal portal - 1 - sketch margaret hagan
Can we have forms integrated right into centralized legal help guides? Less clicking, resources right there where you need them.
Centralized legal portal - 1 - sketch margaret hagan
Can we have smart process guides for any of the legal remedies that we offer to lay people online — to let them see what a path would look like, and how to pursue it?
Centralized legal portal - 1 - sketch margaret hagan
Can we triage people right to the correct legal pathway & accompanying, local legal services?
Centralized legal portal - 1 - sketch margaret hagan
What would a central legal help portal look like, that helped people with common Internet legal-ish searches and directs them to guides, resources, and service-providers for relevant legal actions?

Do you have any more thoughts on these action-plans, or these concept designs? Or do you have connections & resources for me? Send them along, please!

 

Categories
Advocates Ideabook

Strong, coordinated Legal Brands

Legal Design Ideabook - Stronger Legal Brands
Could we build stronger legal public relations, outreach, and onramping to the world of legal services?

One stream of ideas for improving access to justice: can we brand legal services & lawyers, to make them more known, more trustworthy, more purchase-able & engaging for non-lawyers?

Branding for Access to Justice

access to justice ideabook - concept - branding legal services

access to justice ideabook - concept - branding lawyers

Categories
Ideabook Integration into Community

Every state should have a single legal help portal #abafutures

image

More calls for streamlined legal help services, this time from Jim Sandman of the Legal Services Corporation.

Categories
Ideabook Work Product Tool

Package up legal services with mobile tech #abafutures

image

A thought from this morning ‘so session.

Categories
Background

Legal Innovation Blue Sky Agenda #ABAFutures

Legal Innovation Blue Sky Agenda
My sketches from this morning’s agenda-setting working group: what are the big challenges to legal innovation? What do we as a profession (and beyond) need to focus on to build a better 21st century legal system?
IMG_20150503_122545.725

IMG_20150503_122527.108

IMG_20150503_122519.189

IMG_20150503_122511.449

IMG_20150503_122503.382

IMG_20150503_122436.906

IMG_20150503_122448.383

IMG_20150503_122831.564

IMG_20150503_122817.778

IMG_20150503_122754.975

IMG_20150503_122741.288

IMG_20150503_122722.056

IMG_20150503_122638.192

IMG_20150503_122649.506

IMG_20150503_122622.013

IMG_20150503_122610.709

IMG_20150503_122558.852

Categories
Background

Why is getting help for legal problems such a labyrinth? #abafutures

image

A great, rousing talk from Bay Area Legal Aid executive director Alex Gulotta. Looking at legal help from a person’s perspectives.

Categories
Ideabook Integration into Community

How do we get law out into immigrant communities?

image

We need to think from immigrants’ points  of view — where they are now, what tech they use, who they trust.

Categories
Ideabook Work Product Tool

To innovate lawyers must democratize their client relationships #abafutures

image

Some more radical thoughts from Denis Weil, provoking lawyers to rethink how they relate to their users to find effective paths toward innovation.